Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorKnudsen, Laust
dc.contributor.authorGazerani, Parisa
dc.contributor.authorMichel, Tanja Maria
dc.contributor.authorSeyedi Vafaee, Manouchehr
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-09T12:56:10Z
dc.date.available2022-02-09T12:56:10Z
dc.date.created2021-10-04T16:08:27Z
dc.date.issued2021-11-09
dc.identifier.issn1051-2284
dc.identifier.issn1552-6569
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2978014
dc.description.abstractBackground and Purpose: Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is a prodromal stage of Alzheimer’s Disease (AD), where neurodegeneration is not as considerable, thereby potentially increasing the effect of treatments. Therefore, highly sensitive and specific classification of subjects with MCI is necessary, where various MRI modalities have displayed promise. Methods: Structural, diffusion and resting state (RS) functional MRI analysis were performed on the AD (n=26), MCI (n=5) and healthy control (HC) (n=14) group. Structural analysis was performed via voxel-based morphometry (VBM) and volumetric subcortical segmentation analysis. Fractional anisotropy and mean diffusivity were estimated during the diffusion analysis. RS analysis investigated seed-based functional connectivity. Classification via support vector machine was performed to evaluate which MRI modality most accurately differentiated the groups. Multiple linear regression was conducted to evaluate the MRI modalities correlation with clinical assessment scores. Results: Classification of MCI and N displayed highest accuracy based on diffusion MRI, which besides demonstrated high correlation with clinical scores. Classification was equally accurate in AD, when using VBM or diffusion tensor imaging measures. Yet, more variance was explained by VBM measures in the clinical assessment scores of the AD group. Conclusions: This study highlights the potential of diffusion MRI in differentiating MCI from HC and AD. However, the results need to be interpreted with caution as sample size and artifacts in the MRI data probably influenced the results.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJournal of Neuroimaging (JON);Volume 32, Issue 1
dc.relation.urihttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jon.12940
dc.subjectAlzheimer’s diseaseen_US
dc.subjectClinical assessmentsen_US
dc.subjectMagnetic resonance imagingen_US
dc.subjectMild cognitive impairmentsen_US
dc.subjectSupport vector machinesen_US
dc.titleThe Role of Multimodal MRI in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer’s Diseaseen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionen_US
cristin.ispublishedfalse
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/jon.12940
dc.identifier.cristin1943146
dc.source.journalJournal of Neuroimaging (JON)en_US
dc.source.volume32en_US
dc.source.issue1en_US
dc.source.pagenumber32en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel