Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorAlmendingen, Kari
dc.contributor.authorBergem, Anne Kristine
dc.contributor.authorSparboe-Nilsen, Bente
dc.contributor.authorKvarme, Lisbeth Gravdal
dc.contributor.authorSaltyte Benth, Jurate
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-21T14:58:11Z
dc.date.available2022-01-21T14:58:11Z
dc.date.created2021-11-18T11:45:20Z
dc.date.issued2021-11-27
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare. 2021, 14 3295-3308.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1178-2390
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2838773
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Children who are “next of kin” (ie, sick/dying/addicted/imprisoned close relatives) are at increased risk for health consequences. Health professionals in Norway are required by law to help such children, and professional educations should focus on this issue. Aim: To assess the extent to which students attending health, social care, and teacher education felt their uni-professional education and a mandatory interprofessional learning (IPL) course had taught them about children as next of kin. To explore variations in student responses according to age and educational background. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study. Students (n = 2811) completed questionnaires relating to IPL courses delivered in 2019 and 2020 (hybrid case-based learning). Students discussed issues relating to interprofessional collaboration targeting children, young people and their families in small IPL groups. Findings: The response rates ranged from 25.8% to 36.0%. All but 5.2% of the students agreed that it was important to learn about children as next of kin. Although 61.9% reported that their education had not taught about such children, 73.8% had gained increased insight from the IPL course (difference 35.7% 95% CI (29.0; 42.0), p < 0.001). The teacher and child welfare students had gained greater insight than the health and social care students. Significant pre- to post-course increases were found among the physiotherapy (p < 0.001), Mensendieck physiotherapy (p < 0.001), teacher education (p < 0.001), early childhood education (p < 0.001), and teacher education in art and design (p = 0.042) students. Conclusion: Nearly 2/3 reported that they had not been taught about children as next of kin at their own educations, but more than 2/3 had gained greater insight from the IPL course. The health and social care students reported the least gain. Although the law has existed for a decade, the topic of children as next of kin is still omitted from most educational programs.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherDove Medical Pressen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJournal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare;Volume 2021:14
dc.rightsNavngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectNext of kin-childrenen_US
dc.subjectRelativesen_US
dc.subjectChildrenen_US
dc.subjectHealthen_US
dc.subjectSocial careen_US
dc.subjectTeachersen_US
dc.subjectInterprofessional collaborationen_US
dc.titleChildren as Next of Kin in Higher Education: An Exploratory Cross-Sectional Study Among Health, Social Care, and Teacher Education Programsen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2021 Almendingen et al.en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S338686
dc.identifier.cristin1955901
dc.source.journalJournal of Multidisciplinary Healthcareen_US
dc.source.volume14en_US
dc.source.pagenumber3295-3308en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal