Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorRabani, Mehrdad
dc.contributor.authorMadessa, Habtamu Bayera
dc.contributor.authorLjungström, Malin
dc.contributor.authorAamodt, Lene
dc.contributor.authorLøvvold, Sandra
dc.contributor.authorNord, Natasa
dc.coverage.spatialNorwayen_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-28T07:36:43Z
dc.date.available2021-09-28T07:36:43Z
dc.date.created2021-07-18T18:32:50Z
dc.date.issued2021-07-16
dc.identifier.issn0360-1323
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2783920
dc.description.abstractThrough a systematic study, this paper conducted a life cycle assessment (LCA) consisting of evaluation of both embodied and operational emissions of different building retrofitting scenarios for a typical office building, located in Norway. LCA analysis was performed via the OneClick LCA tool. The emissions associated with the operational energy use were evaluated for both the reference and optimized building energy models developed in the IDA-ICE models from our previous studies. These models included two different HVAC systems: an all-air (AA) system equipped with a demand control ventilation (DCV) and a hydronic system with the radiator space heating (RSH) and a constant air volume (CAV) ventilation system. The findings showed that, through retrofitting measures, the net total emissions could be reduced up to 52%, from 1336–637 kg carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2-eq)/m2, which was achieved for the life cycle cost (LCC) optimal scenario equipped with the AA system. The share of operational energy use (B6) in the total CO2-eq emissions was around 77% for the reference case, whereas it was around 43–46% for the retrofitting scenarios. The most embodied CO2-eq emitted stages of the LCA through retrofitting concerned the product stage (19–23%), transport to construction site (24–31%), and the end-of-life service (around 25%). The findings confirmed that it was more environmentally friendly to further re-insulate the other parts of the building envelope instead of ground floor, as the latter retrofitting scenario was accompanied with a large increase of embodied emissions.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesBuilding and Environment;Volume 204, 15 October 2021, 108159
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectBuilding retrofittingen_US
dc.subjectZero energy buildingen_US
dc.subjectZero emission buildingen_US
dc.subjectLife cycle assessmentsen_US
dc.subjectLCAen_US
dc.subjectEmbodied CO2-eqen_US
dc.subjectCO2-eq payback timesen_US
dc.titleLife cycle analysis of GHG emissions from the building retrofitting: The case of a Norwegian office buildingen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2021 The Authors.en_US
dc.source.articlenumber108159en_US
cristin.ispublishedfalse
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode2
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108159
dc.identifier.cristin1922034
dc.source.journalBuilding and Environmenten_US
dc.source.volume204en_US
dc.source.pagenumber1-16en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal