dc.contributor.author | Hammervold, Unn Elisabeth | |
dc.contributor.author | Norvoll, Reidun | |
dc.contributor.author | Sagvaag, Hildegunn | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-29T12:18:23Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-06-29T12:18:23Z | |
dc.date.created | 2021-06-15T20:06:34Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021-06-01 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing. 2021, (1-12). | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1351-0126 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2762356 | |
dc.description.abstract | Introduction: Post-incident reviews (PIRs), including patients, nurses and other care providers, following incidents of restraints are recommended in mental health ser- vices. Few studies have examined patients’ experiences and considerations concern- ing PIRs.
Aim: The study aims to explore patients’ perspectives on PIRs in relation to how they experience participation in PIRs and further view PIRs’ potential for care improve- ment and restraint prevention.
Method: We conducted a qualitative study based on individual interviews. Eight current and previous inpatients from two Norwegian mental health services were interviewed.
Results: The patients experienced PIRs as variations on a continuum from being strengthened, developing new coping strategies and processing the restraint event to at the other end of the continuum; PIRs as meaningless, feeling objectified and long- ing for living communication and closeness.
Discussion: PIRs’ beneficial potential is extended in the study. The findings highlight however that personal and institutional conditions influence whether patients expe- rience PIRs as an arena for recovery promotion or PIRs as continuation of coercive contexts.
Implications for practice: We recommend patients’ active participation in planning the PIR. PIRs should be conducted in a supportive atmosphere, including trusted per- sons, emphasizing and acknowledging a dialogical approach. | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | This study is a part of a project founded by Stavanger University, Norway. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Wiley | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing; | |
dc.rights | Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no | * |
dc.subject | Acute mental health | en_US |
dc.subject | Care philosophies | en_US |
dc.subject | Experiences | en_US |
dc.subject | Nursing | en_US |
dc.subject | Patients | en_US |
dc.subject | Post-incident reviews | en_US |
dc.subject | Restraints | en_US |
dc.title | Post-incident Reviews after Restraints, – Potential and Pitfalls. Patients' experiences and considerations | en_US |
dc.type | Peer reviewed | en_US |
dc.type | Journal article | en_US |
dc.description.version | publishedVersion | en_US |
dc.rights.holder | © 2021 The Authors. | en_US |
cristin.ispublished | true | |
cristin.fulltext | original | |
cristin.qualitycode | 1 | |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1111/jpm.12776 | |
dc.identifier.cristin | 1915987 | |
dc.source.journal | Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing | en_US |
dc.source.pagenumber | 12 | en_US |