dc.contributor.author | Golombek, Rolf | |
dc.contributor.author | Greaker, Mads | |
dc.contributor.author | Hoel, Michael | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-27T12:52:58Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-27T12:52:58Z | |
dc.date.created | 2021-02-15T15:59:20Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020-02-05 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Resource and Energy Economics. 2020, 60, (1-12). | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0928-7655 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2756691 | |
dc.description.abstract | An innovator may not be able to capture the full social benefit of her innovation and, therefore, governments support private R&D through various measures. We compare a market good innovation—to develop a more efficient technology to produce a standard market good—with an environmental innovation—to develop a more efficient abatement technology—that has the same potential to increase the social surplus. In the first-best outcome, which can be achieved by offering an R&D subsidy and a diffusion subsidy, the R&D subsidy should be greatest for an environmental innovation, whereas the diffusion subsidy should be greatest for a market good innovation. The ranking of the two types of subsidies reflects that the appropriability problem is greater for an environmental innovation than for a market good innovation. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Resource and Energy Economics;volume 60 | |
dc.rights | Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no | * |
dc.subject | R&D | en_US |
dc.subject | Environmental R&D | en_US |
dc.subject | Innovations | en_US |
dc.subject | Endogenous technological changes | en_US |
dc.subject | Innovation prizes | en_US |
dc.subject | Diffusion subsidy | en_US |
dc.title | Should environmental R&D be prioritized? | en_US |
dc.type | Peer reviewed | en_US |
dc.type | Journal article | en_US |
dc.description.version | publishedVersion | en_US |
dc.rights.holder | © 2020 The Authors. | en_US |
dc.source.articlenumber | 101132 | en_US |
cristin.ispublished | true | |
cristin.fulltext | original | |
cristin.qualitycode | 1 | |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2019.101132 | |
dc.identifier.cristin | 1890040 | |
dc.source.journal | Resource and Energy Economics | en_US |
dc.source.volume | 60 | en_US |
dc.source.pagenumber | 12 | en_US |
dc.relation.project | Norges forskningsråd: 209698 | en_US |
dc.relation.project | EC/FP7/308481 | en_US |