dc.contributor.author | Mengshoel, Anne Marit | |
dc.contributor.author | Feiring, Marte | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-11-23T21:53:58Z | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-02-15T09:00:25Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-11-23T21:53:58Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-02-15T09:00:25Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020-10-26 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Mengshoel AM, Feiring MF: Rethinkng recovery. In: Nicholls D, Groven KSG, Anjum RL, Kinsella. Mobilizing Knowledge in PhysiotherapyCritical Reflections on Foundations and Practices, 2020. Routledge | en |
dc.identifier.isbn | 9780367428181 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10642/9549 | |
dc.description.abstract | In this chapter, we explore recovery as knowledge and practices. In health
sciences, clinical practice and public debates, the understanding of recovery
relates to various interpretations of disease, illness and health. Our analytical
perspective is inspired by theories of knowledge production; in particular,
Jasanoff’s work on co-production of knowledge. In the present chapter, we
unpack two ideal-typical understandings of recovery. According to the first
understanding, recovery is disease-oriented and relates to the treatment’s curative
effects (recovery as outcome), and knowledge production is separated from the
persons and situations involved. The second, meanwhile, sees recovery in terms
of a personal experiential process focusing on illness experience and the process
of overcoming or coming to terms with illness in real-life situations (recovery as
experience). Here, knowledge production integrates persons, contexts and culture.
Recovery as outcome concerns health professionals’ responsibility to choose the
most effective treatment for patients, informed by quantitative effect studies.
Recovery as experience embraces the process undertaken and valued by the
individual person in the act of living that can be informed by qualitative interview
studies. In the third section, we elaborate on how these two understandings of
recovery are integrated into contemporary clinical practice (recovery as coproduction). | en |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.publisher | CRC Press | en |
dc.relation.ispartof | Mobilizing knowledge in physiotherapy. Critical reflections
on foundations and practices | |
dc.rights | This is an Accepted Manuscript of a book chapter published by Routledge/CRC Press in "Mobilizing knowledge in physiotherapy. Critical reflections on foundations and practices" on October 26, 2020, available online:
https://www.routledge.com/Mobilizing-Knowledge-in-Physiotherapy-Critical-Reflections-on-Foundations/Nicholls-Groven-Kinsella-Anjum/p/book/9780367428181 | en |
dc.subject | Recoveries | en |
dc.subject | Outcomes | en |
dc.subject | Personal experiences | en |
dc.subject | Co-production | en |
dc.subject | Knowledge production | en |
dc.subject | Clinical practices | en |
dc.title | Rethinking recovery | en |
dc.type | Chapter | en |
dc.type | Peer reviewed | en |
dc.date.updated | 2020-11-23T21:53:57Z | |
dc.description.version | acceptedVersion | en |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367855338 | |
dc.identifier.cristin | 1844212 | |
dc.source.isbn | 9780367428181 | |