Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorEgerod, Ingrid
dc.contributor.authorKaldan, Gudrun
dc.contributor.authorLindahl, Berit
dc.contributor.authorHansen, Britt Sætre
dc.contributor.authorJensen, Janet Froulund
dc.contributor.authorCollet, Marie Oxenbøll
dc.contributor.authorHalvorsen, Kristin
dc.contributor.authorEriksson, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorOlausson, Sepideh
dc.contributor.authorJensen, Hanne Irene
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-31T16:46:12Z
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-22T21:59:09Z
dc.date.available2020-01-31T16:46:12Z
dc.date.available2020-03-22T21:59:09Z
dc.date.issued2019-08-31
dc.identifier.citationEgerod I, Kaldan, Lindahl B, Hansen BS, Jensen, Collet, Halvorsen KH, Eriksson T, Olausson S, Jensen HI. Trends and recommendations for critical care nursing research in the Nordic countries: Triangulation of review and survey data. Intensive & Critical Care Nursing. 2019en
dc.identifier.issn0964-3397
dc.identifier.issn0964-3397
dc.identifier.issn1532-4036
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10642/8302
dc.description.abstractBackground: Priorities for critical care nursing research have evolved with societal trends and values. In the 1980s priorities were the nursing workforce, in 1990s technical nursing, in 2000s evidence-based nursing and in 2010s symptom management and family-centred care. Objectives: To identify current trends and future recommendations for critical care nursing research in the Nordic countries. Methods: We triangulated the results of a literature review and a survey. A review of two selected critical care nursing journals (2016–2017) was conducted using content analysis to identify contemporary published research. A self-administered computerised cross-sectional survey of Nordic critical care nursing researchers (2017) reported current and future areas of research. Results: A review of 156 papers identified research related to the patient (13%), family (12%), nurse (31%), and therapies (44%). Current trends in the survey (n = 76, response rate 65%) included patient and family involvement, nurse performance and education, and evidence-based protocols. The datasets showed similar trends, but aftercare was only present in the survey. Future trends included symptom management, transitions, rehabilitation, and new nursing roles. Conclusion: Critical care nursing research is trending toward increased collaboration with patient and family, delineating a shift toward user values. Recommendations include long-term outcomes and impact of nursing.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherElsevieren
dc.relation.ispartofseriesIntensive and Critical Care Nursing;Volume 56
dc.subjectCritical care nursingen
dc.subjectIntensive care unitsen
dc.subjectSurveysen
dc.subjectResearch prioritiesen
dc.subjectReviewsen
dc.titleTrends and recommendations for critical care nursing research in the Nordic countries: Triangulation of review and survey dataen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.typePeer revieweden
dc.date.updated2020-01-31T16:46:12Z
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iccn.2019.102765
dc.identifier.cristin1759249
dc.source.journalIntensive & Critical Care Nursing


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel