Safe surgery checklist, patient safety, teamwork and responsibility - coequal demands? A Focus Group study
dc.contributor.author | Willassen, Elin Thove | |
dc.contributor.author | Jacobsen, Inger Lise Smith | |
dc.contributor.author | Tveiten, Sidsel | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-04-15T11:39:01Z | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-05-23T06:59:46Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-04-15T11:39:01Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-05-23T06:59:46Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018-03-28 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Willassen ET, Jacobsen ILS, Tveiten S. Safe surgery checklist, patient safety, teamwork and responsibility - coequal demands? A Focus Group study. Global Qualitative Nursing Research. 2018;5 | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 2333-3936 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2333-3936 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10642/7150 | |
dc.description.abstract | The use of World Health Organization’s (WHO’s) Safe Surgery checklist is an established practice worldwide and contributes toward ensuring patient safety and collaborative teamwork. The aim of this study was to elucidate operating room nurses’ and operating room nursing students’ experiences and opinions about execution of and compliance with checklists. We chose a qualitative design with semistructured focus group discussions. Qualitative content analysis was conducted. Two main themes were identified; the Safe Surgery checklists have varied influence on teamwork and patient safety, and taking responsibility for executing the checks on the Safe Surgery checklist entails practical and ethical challenges. The experiences and opinions of operating room nurses and their students revealed differences of practices and attitudes toward checklist compliance and the intentions of checklist procedures. These differences are related to cultural and professional distances between team members and their understanding of the Safe Surgery checklists as a tool for patient safety. | en |
dc.description.sponsorship | The authors received financial support from Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Sciences in Norway. The purpose of the funding is to finance research and professional development. | en |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.publisher | SAGE Publications | en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Global Qualitative Nursing Research;Volume: 5 | |
dc.rights | Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons AttributionNonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). | en |
dc.rights.uri | http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ | |
dc.subject | Patient safety | en |
dc.subject | Checklists | en |
dc.subject | Responsibilities | en |
dc.subject | Operating room nurses | en |
dc.subject | Cultures | en |
dc.subject | Qualities | en |
dc.title | Safe surgery checklist, patient safety, teamwork and responsibility - coequal demands? A Focus Group study | en |
dc.type | Journal article | |
dc.type | Journal article | en |
dc.type | Peer reviewed | en |
dc.date.updated | 2019-04-15T11:39:01Z | |
dc.description.version | publishedVersion | en |
dc.identifier.doi | http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2333393618764070 | |
dc.identifier.cristin | 1627805 | |
dc.source.journal | Global Qualitative Nursing Research |
Tilhørende fil(er)
Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)
-
HV - Institutt for sykepleie og helsefremmende arbeid [1386]
HV - Department of Nursing and Health Promotion
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons AttributionNonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).