Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorHolthe, Torhild
dc.contributor.authorHalvorsrud, Liv
dc.contributor.authorKarterud, Dag
dc.contributor.authorHoel, Kari Anne
dc.contributor.authorLund, Anne
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-15T11:24:40Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-21T13:23:39Z
dc.date.available2019-04-15T11:24:40Z
dc.date.available2019-05-21T13:23:39Z
dc.date.issued2018-01-20
dc.identifier.citationHolthe T, Halvorsrud L, Karterud D, Hoel KA, Lund A. Usability and acceptability of technology for community-dwelling older adults with mild cognitive impairment and dementia: A systematic literature review. Clinical Interventions in Aging. 2018;13:863-886en
dc.identifier.issn1178-1998
dc.identifier.issn1178-1998
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10642/7137
dc.description.abstractBackground: The objective of this review was to obtain an overview of the technologies that have been explored with older adults with mild cognitive impairment and dementia (MCI/D), current knowledge on the usability and acceptability of such technologies, and how people with MCI/D and their family carers (FCs) were involved in these studies. Materials and methods: Primary studies published between 2007 and 2017 that explored the use of technologies for community-dwelling people with MCI/D were identified through five databases: MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Embase, AMED, and CINAHL. Twenty-nine out of 359 papers met the criteria for eligibility. We used the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool for quality assessment. Results: A wide range of technologies was presented in the 29 studies, sorted into four domains: 1) safe walking indoors and outdoors; 2) safe living; 3) independent living; and 4) entertainment and social communication. The current state of knowledge regarding usability and acceptability reveals that even if researchers are aware of these concepts and intend to measure usability and acceptability, they seem difficult to assess. Terms such as “user friendliness” and “acceptance” were used frequently. User participation in the 29 studies was high. Persons with MCI/D, FCs, and staff/other older adults were involved in focus groups, workshops, and interviews as part of the preimplementation process. Conclusion: Research regarding technologies to support people with MCI/D seems optimistic, and a wide range of technologies has been evaluated in homes with people with MCI/D and their FCs. A major finding was the importance of including people with MCI/D and their FCs in research, in order to learn about required design features to enhance usability and acceptability. Surprisingly, very few studies reported on the consequences of technology use with regard to quality of life, occupational performance, or human dignity.en
dc.description.sponsorshipThe Norwegian Research Council funded the Assisted Living Project. Oslo and Akershus University College, HIOA, financed this Dove Press Open Access publication. Norges forskningsråd 247620en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherDove Medical Pressen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesClinical Interventions in Aging;Volume 13
dc.rights© 2018 Holthe et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).en
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
dc.subjectTechnologiesen
dc.subjectAlzheimer’s diseaseen
dc.subjectCopingen
dc.subjectSafetyen
dc.subjectLife qualitiesen
dc.subjectDignityen
dc.titleUsability and acceptability of technology for community-dwelling older adults with mild cognitive impairment and dementia: A systematic literature reviewen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.typePeer revieweden
dc.date.updated2019-04-15T11:24:40Z
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S154717
dc.identifier.cristin1584767
dc.source.journalClinical Interventions in Aging
dc.relation.projectIDNorges forskningsråd: 247620


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

© 2018 Holthe et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php  and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som © 2018 Holthe et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).