Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorShadloo, Mostafa Safdari
dc.contributor.authorHadjadj, Abdellah
dc.contributor.authorChaudhuri, A
dc.contributor.authorBen-Nasr, Ouissem
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-04T23:52:48Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-18T09:25:41Z
dc.date.available2019-02-04T23:52:48Z
dc.date.available2019-03-18T09:25:41Z
dc.date.issued2017-09-20
dc.identifier.citationShadloo, Hadjadj A, Chaudhuri A, Ben-Nasr. Large-eddy simulation of a spatially-evolving supersonic turbulent boundary layer at M∞= 2. European journal of mechanics. B, Fluids. 2018;67:185-197en
dc.identifier.issn0997-7546
dc.identifier.issn0997-7546
dc.identifier.issn1873-7390
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10642/6788
dc.description.abstractThe ability of large-eddy simulation (LES) to resolve the most energetic coherent structures of a spatially-evolving supersonic turbulent boundary layer over a flat plate at M∞ =2 and Reθ ≈ 6000 is analyzed using three types of local subgrid scale models. Aditionally, an Implicit LES (ILES), which relies on the intrinsic numerical dissipation to act as a subgrid model, is investigated to assess the consistency and the accuracy of the method. Direct comparison with data from high resolution DNS calculations [S. Pirozzoli and M. Bernardini, Turbulence in supersonic boundary layers at moderate Reynolds number, J. Fluid Mech, 68, 120-168, 2011] provides validation of the different modeling approaches. Turbulence statistics up to the fourth-order are reported, which helps emphasizing some salient features related to near-wall asymptotic behavior, mesh resolution and models prediction. Detailed analysis of the nearwall asymptotic behavior of all relevant quantities shows that the models are able to correctly reproduce the near-wall tendencies. The thermodynamic fluctuations, Trms and ρrms, show a lack of independence from SGS modeling and grid refinement in contrast to the velocity fluctuating field. The pressure fluctuations, which are assumed to be associated with the acoustic mode, are not significantly affected by the modeling and the mesh resolution. Furthermore, the comparison of different contributions to the viscous dissipation reveals that the solenoidal dissipation plays the most dominant role regardless of the model. Finally, it is found that the ILES is more likely to produce consistent results even though a small amount of numerical viscosity is introduced through a sixth-order skew-symmetric split-centered scheme to emulate the effects of unresolved scales.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherElsevieren
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEuropean Journal of Mechanics - B/Fluids;Volume 67, January–February
dc.rightsAuthor can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing). Author cannot archive publisher's version/PDF.en
dc.subjectSubgrid-scale modelingsen
dc.subjectSupersonic Turbulent Boundary Layeren
dc.subjectWall-adapting local eddy-viscosityen
dc.subjectDynamic Smagorinsky modelsen
dc.subjectCoherent Structures modelsen
dc.subjectImplicit LESen
dc.titleLarge-eddy simulation of a spatially-evolving supersonic turbulent boundary layer at M∞= 2en
dc.typeJournal article
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.typePeer revieweden
dc.date.updated2019-02-04T23:52:48Z
dc.description.versionsubmittedVersionen
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euromechflu.2017.09.005
dc.identifier.cristin1508527
dc.source.journalEuropean journal of mechanics. B, Fluids


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel