dc.contributor.advisor | Arntzen, Erik | |
dc.contributor.author | Poulsen, Annika | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-08-30T09:06:14Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-08-30T09:06:14Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10642/6110 | |
dc.description | Master i læring i komplekse systemer | en |
dc.description.abstract | Article 1 is a literature review which covered the use of instructions in stimulus equivalence research in two time periods. The results showed that instructions differ to a great extent. The most commonly used instruction was categorized as not task specific instructions, followed by general instructions.
Article 2 is an empirical study which investigated if different types of instructions affected responding in accordance with stimulus equivalence. The main results showed that the group which got general instructions had a higher yield of equivalence class responding compared to the other two groups which got specific instructions or no instructions at all. | en |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.publisher | OsloMet - storbyuniversitetet. Institutt for atferdsvitenskap | en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | MALKS;2018 | |
dc.subject | Stimulus equivalence | en |
dc.subject | Instructions | en |
dc.subject | Matching-to-sample | en |
dc.subject | Conditional discriminations | en |
dc.title | Stimulus equivalence and instructions | en |
dc.type | Master thesis | en |
dc.description.version | publishedVersion | en |