Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorAda, Louise
dc.contributor.authorFoongchomcheay, Anchalee
dc.contributor.authorLanghammer, Birgitta
dc.contributor.authorPreston, Elisabeth
dc.contributor.authorStanton, Rosalyn
dc.contributor.authorPaul, Serene
dc.contributor.authorCanning, Colleen
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-10T14:14:26Z
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-30T07:21:50Z
dc.date.available2017-05-10T14:14:26Z
dc.date.available2017-06-30T07:21:50Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationAda, Foongchomcheay, Langhammer MB, Preston, Stanton, Paul, Canning. Laptray and triangular sling are no more effective than a hemisling in preventing shoulder subluxation in those at risk early after stroke: A randomised trial. . European Journal of Physical rehabilitation medicine. 2016language
dc.identifier.issn0014-2573
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10642/5024
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Shoulder subluxation is a common secondary impairment of the upper limb following stroke. A range of supportive devices are used in rehabilitation to prevent shoulder subluxation, including hemi-slings and firm supports, such as arm troughs, however, there is little evidence regarding their efficacy. AIM: To determine whether a modified lap-tray during sitting and a triangular sling during standing is more effective than a hemi-sling in preventing shoulder subluxation, pain, contracture and upper limb activity limitation after stroke. DESIGN: A prospective, randomised trial with concealed allocation, assessor blinding and intention-to-treat analysis. SETTING: Three inpatient rehabilitation units in Australia and Norway. POPULATION: Forty-six acute stroke survivors within 3 weeks of stroke who were at risk of subluxation. METHOD: The experimental group used a modified lap-tray while sitting and a triangular sling while standing to support the affected arm for four weeks. The control group used a hemi-sling while sitting and standing. The primary outcome was amount of shoulder subluxation on X-ray. Secondary outcomes were upper limb activity, pain and contracture. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between groups in terms of shoulder subluxation (MD -3 mm, 95% CI -8 to 3). There was a trend for the experimental group to develop less pain at rest (MD -0.7 out of 10, 95% CI -2.2 to 0.8) and during shoulder external rotation (MD -1.7 out of 10, 95% CI -3.7 to 0.3) and a trend towards having less contracture of shoulder external rotation (MD -10 deg, 95% CI -22 to 2). There was no significant difference between groups in terms of other contractures and activity of the upper limb. CONCLUSION: A lap-tray during sitting combined with a triangular sling during standing is no more effective than a hemi-sling in preventing subluxation, pain, contracture and activity limitation in acute stroke survivors at risk of shoulder subluxation. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: The use of a lap-tray during sitting and triangular sling during standing is not indicated as an alternative to the hemi-sling to prevent shoulder subluxation in patients after stroke, so alternative strategies with proven efficacy, such as electrical stimulation, should be considered.language
dc.language.isoenlanguage
dc.publisherEdizioni Minerva Medicalanguage
dc.subjectRandomized Controlled Triallanguage
dc.subjectStrokelanguage
dc.subjectGlenohumeral Subluxationlanguage
dc.subjectPhysiotherapy (Techniques)language
dc.titleLaptray and triangular sling are no more effective than a hemisling in preventing shoulder subluxation in those at risk early after stroke: A randomised trial.language
dc.typeJournal articlelanguage
dc.typePeer reviewedlanguage
dc.date.updated2017-05-10T14:14:26Z
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionlanguage
dc.identifier.doihttp://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.16.04209-X
dc.identifier.cristin1298682
dc.source.journalEuropean Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel