Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorBonsaksen, Toreen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-01-24T11:17:00Z
dc.date.available2014-01-24T11:17:00Z
dc.date.issued2013en_US
dc.identifier.citationBonsaksen, T. (2013). Self-reported therapeutic style in occupational therapy students. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 76(11), 496-502 . doi: 10.4276/030802213X13833255804595en_US
dc.identifier.issn0308-0226en_US
dc.identifier.otherFRIDAID 1043111en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10642/1783
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: The client-therapist relationship has long been viewed as important for both the process and outcomes of occupational therapy. The recently developed Intentional Relationship Model introduced six therapeutic modes as different ways of relating to clients. Increasing students’ awareness of modes, and increasing their skills in using them flexibly, has the potential of improving their subsequent practice as occupational therapists. This article aims to describe occupational therapy students’ affiliation with the therapeutic modes in a variety of hypothesized practice situations. In addition, relationships between the students’ affiliation with the different modes are explored. Method: The study had a cross-sectional design. Data were collected from 31 occupational therapy students in Norway, using the Self-Assessment of Modes Questionnaire. Descriptive analyses, repeated measures ANOVA tests, and correlation analyses were employed in the analytic procedures. Findings: The students identified the problem-solving mode to be their most preferred way of relating to clients, whereas the advocating mode was the least preferred. High affiliation with the problem-solving mode was significantly associated with low affiliation with the collaborating mode. Conclusion: Several limitations indicate that caution should be taken when comparing this study with previous research. Nonetheless, differences between the results of this study and previous work on the therapeutic modes are of interest. Possible explanations for differences are discussed, as are implications for practice and research.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherCollege of Occupational Therapistsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesBritish Journal of Occupational Therapy;76(11)en_US
dc.subjectIntentional relationship modelen_US
dc.subjectTherapeutic relationshipen_US
dc.subjectTherapeutic modesen_US
dc.titleSelf-reported therapeutic style in occupational therapy studentsen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.version© The College of Occupational Therapist Ltd.en_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.4276/030802213X13833255804595


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel